[PATCH 2/2] block: remove newlines from the warnings in blk_validate_integrity_limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Otherwise they are very hard to read in the kernel log.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-settings.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 491c0c48d52b..d6438e6c276d 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -157,16 +157,14 @@ static int blk_validate_integrity_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
 	switch (bi->csum_type) {
 	case BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_NONE:
 		if (bi->pi_tuple_size) {
-			pr_warn("pi_tuple_size must be 0 when checksum type \
-				 is none\n");
+			pr_warn("pi_tuple_size must be 0 when checksum type is none\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		break;
 	case BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_CRC:
 	case BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_IP:
 		if (bi->pi_tuple_size != sizeof(struct t10_pi_tuple)) {
-			pr_warn("pi_tuple_size mismatch for T10 PI: expected \
-				 %zu, got %u\n",
+			pr_warn("pi_tuple_size mismatch for T10 PI: expected %zu, got %u\n",
 				 sizeof(struct t10_pi_tuple),
 				 bi->pi_tuple_size);
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -174,8 +172,7 @@ static int blk_validate_integrity_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
 		break;
 	case BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_CRC64:
 		if (bi->pi_tuple_size != sizeof(struct crc64_pi_tuple)) {
-			pr_warn("pi_tuple_size mismatch for CRC64 PI: \
-				 expected %zu, got %u\n",
+			pr_warn("pi_tuple_size mismatch for CRC64 PI: expected %zu, got %u\n",
 				 sizeof(struct crc64_pi_tuple),
 				 bi->pi_tuple_size);
 			return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.47.2





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux