On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:10:38AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > From: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Despite its name, the block layer is fine with segments smaller that the > "min_segment_size" limit. The value is an optimization limit indicating > the largest aligned segment that can be used without considering segment > boundary limits, so give it a name that reflects that. But max_aligned_segment also feels wrong for that. It's not really the maximum alignmnet, it is the fast path alignment. Maybe something like fast_segment_granularity or nosplit_segment_granularity?
