Re: [PATCH 03/23] ublk: refactor auto buffer register in ublk_dispatch_req()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 3:03 AM Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Refactor auto buffer register code and prepare for supporting batch IO
> feature, and the main motivation is to put 'ublk_io' operation code
> together, so that per-io lock can be applied for the code block.
>
> The key changes are:
> - Rename ublk_auto_buf_reg() as ublk_do_auto_buf_reg()

Thanks, the type and the function having the same name was a minor annoyance.

> - Introduce an enum `auto_buf_reg_res` to represent the result of
>   the buffer registration attempt (FAIL, FALLBACK, OK).
> - Split the existing `ublk_do_auto_buf_reg` function into two:
>   - `__ublk_do_auto_buf_reg`: Performs the actual buffer registration
>     and returns the `auto_buf_reg_res` status.
>   - `ublk_do_auto_buf_reg`: A wrapper that calls the internal function
>     and handles the I/O preparation based on the result.
> - Introduce `ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg_io` to encapsulate the logic for
>   preparing the I/O for completion after buffer registration.
> - Pass the `tag` directly to `ublk_auto_buf_reg_fallback` to avoid
>   recalculating it.
>
> This refactoring makes the control flow clearer and isolates the different
> stages of the auto buffer registration process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 9185978abeb7..e53f623b0efe 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -1205,17 +1205,36 @@ static inline void __ublk_abort_rq(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
>  }
>
>  static void
> -ublk_auto_buf_reg_fallback(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io)
> +ublk_auto_buf_reg_fallback(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, unsigned tag)
>  {
> -       unsigned tag = io - ubq->ios;

The reason to calculate the tag like this was to avoid the pointer
dereference in req->tag. But req->tag is already accessed just prior
in ublk_dispatch_req(), so it should be cached and not too expensive
to load again.

>         struct ublksrv_io_desc *iod = ublk_get_iod(ubq, tag);
>
>         iod->op_flags |= UBLK_IO_F_NEED_REG_BUF;
>  }
>
> -static bool ublk_auto_buf_reg(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
> -                             struct ublk_io *io, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> -                             unsigned int issue_flags)
> +enum auto_buf_reg_res {
> +       AUTO_BUF_REG_FAIL,
> +       AUTO_BUF_REG_FALLBACK,
> +       AUTO_BUF_REG_OK,
> +};

nit: move this enum definition next to the function that returns it?

> +
> +static void ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> +                                  struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io,
> +                                  struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, bool registered)

How about passing enum auto_buf_reg_res instead of bool registered to
avoid the duplicated == AUTO_BUF_REG_OK in the callers?

> +{
> +       if (registered) {
> +               io->task_registered_buffers = 1;
> +               io->buf_ctx_handle = io_uring_cmd_ctx_handle(cmd);
> +               io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_AUTO_BUF_REG;
> +       }
> +       ublk_init_req_ref(ubq, io);
> +       __ublk_prep_compl_io_cmd(io, req);
> +}
> +
> +static enum auto_buf_reg_res
> +__ublk_do_auto_buf_reg(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
> +                      struct ublk_io *io, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> +                      unsigned int issue_flags)
>  {
>         int ret;
>
> @@ -1223,29 +1242,27 @@ static bool ublk_auto_buf_reg(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
>                                       io->buf.auto_reg.index, issue_flags);
>         if (ret) {
>                 if (io->buf.auto_reg.flags & UBLK_AUTO_BUF_REG_FALLBACK) {
> -                       ublk_auto_buf_reg_fallback(ubq, io);
> -                       return true;
> +                       ublk_auto_buf_reg_fallback(ubq, req->tag);
> +                       return AUTO_BUF_REG_FALLBACK;
>                 }
>                 blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_IOERR);
> -               return false;
> +               return AUTO_BUF_REG_FAIL;
>         }
>
> -       io->task_registered_buffers = 1;
> -       io->buf_ctx_handle = io_uring_cmd_ctx_handle(cmd);
> -       io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_AUTO_BUF_REG;
> -       return true;
> +       return AUTO_BUF_REG_OK;
>  }
>
> -static bool ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> -                                  struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io,
> -                                  struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> -                                  unsigned int issue_flags)
> +static void ublk_do_auto_buf_reg(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
> +                                struct ublk_io *io, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> +                                unsigned int issue_flags)
>  {
> -       ublk_init_req_ref(ubq, io);
> -       if (ublk_support_auto_buf_reg(ubq) && ublk_rq_has_data(req))
> -               return ublk_auto_buf_reg(ubq, req, io, cmd, issue_flags);
> +       enum auto_buf_reg_res res = __ublk_do_auto_buf_reg(ubq, req, io, cmd,
> +                       issue_flags);
>
> -       return true;
> +       if (res != AUTO_BUF_REG_FAIL) {
> +               ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg_io(ubq, req, io, cmd, res == AUTO_BUF_REG_OK);
> +               io_uring_cmd_done(cmd, UBLK_IO_RES_OK, 0, issue_flags);
> +       }
>  }
>
>  static bool ublk_start_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
> @@ -1318,8 +1335,14 @@ static void ublk_dispatch_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
>         if (!ublk_start_io(ubq, req, io))
>                 return;
>
> -       if (ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg(ubq, req, io, io->cmd, issue_flags))
> +       if (ublk_support_auto_buf_reg(ubq) && ublk_rq_has_data(req)) {
> +               struct io_uring_cmd *cmd = io->cmd;

Don't really see the need for this intermediate variable

Best,
Caleb

> +
> +               ublk_do_auto_buf_reg(ubq, req, io, cmd, issue_flags);
> +       } else {
> +               ublk_init_req_ref(ubq, io);
>                 ublk_complete_io_cmd(io, req, UBLK_IO_RES_OK, issue_flags);
> +       }
>  }
>
>  static void ublk_cmd_tw_cb(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> --
> 2.47.0
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux