Re: [PATCH 0/3] block: replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue() users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 05 Sep 2025 10:51:38 +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Below is a summary of a discussion about the Workqueue API and cpu isolation
> considerations. Details and more information are available here:
> 
>         "workqueue: Always use wq_select_unbound_cpu() for WORK_CPU_UNBOUND."
>         https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> === Current situation: problems ===
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/3] drivers/block: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
      commit: 51723bf92679427bba09a76fc13e1b0a93b680bc
[2/3] drivers/block: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
      commit: 456cefcb312d90d12dbcf7eaf6b3f7cfae6f622b
[3/3] drivers/block: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
      commit: d7b1cdc9108f46f47a0899597d6fa270f64dd98c

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe







[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux