Re: [PATCH for-6.18/block 06/10] blk-mq: split bitmap grow and resize case in blk_mq_update_nr_requests()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

在 2025/9/9 20:18, Nilay Shroff 写道:

On 9/8/25 11:45 AM, Yu Kuai wrote:
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

No functional changes are intended, make code cleaner and prepare to fix
the grow case in following patches.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  block/blk-mq.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 1ff6370f7314..82fa81036115 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -4931,21 +4931,25 @@ int blk_mq_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int nr)
  			blk_mq_tag_update_sched_shared_tags(q);
  		else
  			blk_mq_tag_resize_shared_tags(set, nr);
-	} else {
+	} else if (!q->elevator) {
  		queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
  			if (!hctx->tags)
  				continue;
-			/*
-			 * If we're using an MQ scheduler, just update the
-			 * scheduler queue depth. This is similar to what the
-			 * old code would do.
-			 */
-			if (hctx->sched_tags)
-				ret = blk_mq_tag_update_depth(hctx,
-							&hctx->sched_tags, nr);
-			else
-				ret = blk_mq_tag_update_depth(hctx,
-							&hctx->tags, nr);
+			sbitmap_queue_resize(&hctx->tags->bitmap_tags,
+				nr - hctx->tags->nr_reserved_tags);
+		}
+	} else if (nr <= q->elevator->et->nr_requests) {
+		queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
+			if (!hctx->sched_tags)
+				continue;
+			sbitmap_queue_resize(&hctx->sched_tags->bitmap_tags,
+				nr - hctx->sched_tags->nr_reserved_tags);
+		}
+	} else {
+		queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
+			if (!hctx->sched_tags)
+				continue;
+			blk_mq_tag_update_depth(hctx, &hctx->sched_tags, nr);
  			if (ret)
  				goto out;
  		}
The above code is good however can this be bit simplified?
It's a bit difficult to follow through all nesting and so
could it be simplified as below:

if (shared-tags) {
     if (elevator)
        // resize sched-shared-tags bitmap
     else
        // resize shared-tags bitmap
} else {
     // non-shared tags
     if (elevator) {
         if (new-depth-is-less-than-the-current-depth)
             // resize sched-tags bitmap
         else
             // handle sched tags grow
     } else
         // resize tags bitmap
}

AFAIK, if - else if chain should be better than nested if - else, right?

If you don't mind, I can add comments to each else if chain to make code cleaner:

if () {
	/* shared tags */
	...
} else if () {
	/* non-shared tags and elevator is none */
	...
} else if () {
	/* non-shared tags and elevator is not none, nr_requests doesn't grow */
	...
} else () {
	/* non-shared tags and elevator is not none, nr_requests grow */
	...
}

Thanks,
Kuai


Thanks,
--Nilay






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux