On 8/13/2025 9:01 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> + * blk_rq_integrity_dma_map_iter_start - map the next integrity DMA segment for
> + * a request
> + * @req: request to map
> + * @dma_dev: device to map to
> + * @state: DMA IOVA state
> + * @iter: block layer DMA iterator
> + *
> + * Iterate to the next integrity mapping after a previous call to
> + * blk_rq_integrity_dma_map_iter_start(). See there for a detailed description
> + * of the arguments.
> + *
> + * Returns %false if there is no segment to map, including due to an error, or
> + * %true if it did map a segment.
> + *
> + * If a segment was mapped, the DMA address for it is returned in @iter.addr and
> + * the length in @iter.len. If no segment was mapped the status code is
> + * returned in @iter.status.
> + */
> +bool blk_rq_integrity_dma_map_iter_next(struct request *req,
> + struct device *dma_dev, struct blk_dma_iter *iter)
> +{
The function comment should also use the name
"blk_rq_integrity_dma_map_iter_next".
Otherwise, looks good.
Reviewed-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@xxxxxxxxxxx>
