Re: [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: Replace tags->lock with SRCU for tag iterators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/1/25 13:44, Ming Lei wrote:
Replace the spinlock in blk_mq_find_and_get_req() with an SRCU read lock
around the tag iterators.

This is done by:

- Holding the SRCU read lock in blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(),
blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(), and blk_mq_hctx_has_requests().

- Removing the now-redundant tags->lock from blk_mq_find_and_get_req().

This change improves performance by replacing a spinlock with a more
scalable SRCU lock, and fixes lockup issue in scsi_host_busy() in case of
shost->host_blocked.

Meantime it becomes possible to use blk_mq_in_driver_rw() for io
accounting.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  block/blk-mq-tag.c | 12 ++++++++----
  block/blk-mq.c     | 24 ++++--------------------
  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 6c2f5881e0de..7ae431077a32 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -256,13 +256,10 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_find_and_get_req(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
  		unsigned int bitnr)
  {
  	struct request *rq;
-	unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tags->lock, flags);
  	rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
  	if (!rq || rq->tag != bitnr || !req_ref_inc_not_zero(rq))
  		rq = NULL;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
  	return rq;
  }
@@ -440,7 +437,9 @@ void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
  		busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv)
  {
  	unsigned int flags = tagset->flags;
-	int i, nr_tags;
+	int i, nr_tags, srcu_idx;
+
+	srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&tagset->tags_srcu);
nr_tags = blk_mq_is_shared_tags(flags) ? 1 : tagset->nr_hw_queues; @@ -449,6 +448,7 @@ void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
  			__blk_mq_all_tag_iter(tagset->tags[i], fn, priv,
  					      BT_TAG_ITER_STARTED);
  	}
+	srcu_read_unlock(&tagset->tags_srcu, srcu_idx);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter);
@@ -499,6 +499,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request);
  void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_tag_iter_fn *fn,
  		void *priv)
  {
+	int srcu_idx;
+
  	/*
  	 * __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() updates nr_hw_queues and hctx_table
  	 * while the queue is frozen. So we can use q_usage_counter to avoid
@@ -507,6 +509,7 @@ void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_tag_iter_fn *fn,
  	if (!percpu_ref_tryget(&q->q_usage_counter))
  		return;
+ srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&q->tag_set->tags_srcu);
  	if (blk_mq_is_shared_tags(q->tag_set->flags)) {
  		struct blk_mq_tags *tags = q->tag_set->shared_tags;
  		struct sbitmap_queue *bresv = &tags->breserved_tags;
@@ -536,6 +539,7 @@ void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_tag_iter_fn *fn,
  			bt_for_each(hctx, q, btags, fn, priv, false);
  		}
  	}
+	srcu_read_unlock(&q->tag_set->tags_srcu, srcu_idx);
  	blk_queue_exit(q);
  }
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 7b4ab8e398b6..43b15e58ffe1 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -3415,7 +3415,6 @@ static void blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags,
  				    struct blk_mq_tags *tags)
  {
  	struct page *page;
-	unsigned long flags;
/*
  	 * There is no need to clear mapping if driver tags is not initialized
@@ -3439,15 +3438,6 @@ static void blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags,
  			}
  		}
  	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Wait until all pending iteration is done.
-	 *
-	 * Request reference is cleared and it is guaranteed to be observed
-	 * after the ->lock is released.
-	 */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&drv_tags->lock, flags);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drv_tags->lock, flags);
  }
void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
@@ -3670,8 +3660,12 @@ static bool blk_mq_hctx_has_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
  	struct rq_iter_data data = {
  		.hctx	= hctx,
  	};
+	int srcu_idx;
+ srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&hctx->queue->tag_set->tags_srcu);
  	blk_mq_all_tag_iter(tags, blk_mq_has_request, &data);
+	srcu_read_unlock(&hctx->queue->tag_set->tags_srcu, srcu_idx);
+
  	return data.has_rq;
  }
@@ -3891,7 +3885,6 @@ static void blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
  		unsigned int queue_depth, struct request *flush_rq)
  {
  	int i;
-	unsigned long flags;
/* The hw queue may not be mapped yet */
  	if (!tags)
@@ -3901,15 +3894,6 @@ static void blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
for (i = 0; i < queue_depth; i++)
  		cmpxchg(&tags->rqs[i], flush_rq, NULL);
-
-	/*
-	 * Wait until all pending iteration is done.
-	 *
-	 * Request reference is cleared and it is guaranteed to be observed
-	 * after the ->lock is released.
-	 */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&tags->lock, flags);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
  }
static void blk_free_flush_queue_callback(struct rcu_head *head)

While this looks good, I do wonder what happened to the 'fq' srcu.
Don't we need to insert an srcu_read_lock() when we're trying to
access it?

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux