On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 11:49 PM Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu 24-07-25 16:30:01, Tang Yizhou wrote: > > From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The symbol wb_window_usec cannot be found. Update the doc to reflect the > > latest implementation, in other words, the cur_win_nsec member of struct > > rq_wb. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I think the name should be actually 'curr_win_nsec' because that's the name > of this value shown in debugfs. > > Honza Agreed, I will make the change in the next patch. Thanks, Yi > > > --- > > Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block | 10 +++++----- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block > > index 4ba771b56b3b..7bb4dce73eca 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block > > @@ -731,11 +731,11 @@ Contact: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Description: > > [RW] If the device is registered for writeback throttling, then > > this file shows the target minimum read latency. If this latency > > - is exceeded in a given window of time (see wb_window_usec), then > > - the writeback throttling will start scaling back writes. Writing > > - a value of '0' to this file disables the feature. Writing a > > - value of '-1' to this file resets the value to the default > > - setting. > > + is exceeded in a given window of time (see the cur_win_nsec > > + member of struct rq_wb), then the writeback throttling will > > + start scaling back writes. Writing a value of '0' to this file > > + disables the feature. Writing a value of '-1' to this file > > + resets the value to the default setting. > > > > > > What: /sys/block/<disk>/queue/write_cache > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > > -- > Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> > SUSE Labs, CR