On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 10:18:52AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > @@ -124,9 +125,13 @@ static struct bio *bio_submit_split(struct bio *bio, int split_sectors) > trace_block_split(split, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector); > WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_zone_write_plugging(bio)); > submit_bio_noacct(bio); > - return split; > + > + bio = split; > } > > + if (unlikely(!blk_crypto_bio_prep(&bio))) > + return NULL; Is this reached for every bio for every block device? If not, then this patch causes data to sometimes be left unencrypted when the submitter of the bio provided an encryption context, which isn't okay. - Eric
