Re: [PATCH 77/80] block: pm: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 77/80] block: pm: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 22:59:27 -0700
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250704075501.3223068-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
References: <20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20250704075501.3223068-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>

Sending a single patch out of many to a list makes it unreviable.

That might not matter as a 80 patch series is basically unreviable
anyway.

References:
- [PATCH 77/80] block: pm: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls
  - From: Sakari Ailus

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] block/partitions: detect LUKS-formatted disks
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] block: remove pktcdvd driver
Previous by thread: [PATCH 77/80] block: pm: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls
Next by thread: [PATCH] block: reject bs > ps block devices when THP is disabled
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux