Re: [PATCH v2] block: reject bs > ps block devices when THP is disabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: reject bs > ps block devices when THP is disabled
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 13:47:25 +0100
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>, mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, gost.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250704095036.293568-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com>
References: <20250704095036.293568-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com>

On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 11:50:36AM +0200, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> Changes since v1:
> - Use mapping_max_folio_size_supported() instead of doing a ifdef with
>   CONFIG_THP

why?  v1 looked better to me

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] block: reject bs > ps block devices when THP is disabled
  - From: Pankaj Raghav

References:
- [PATCH v2] block: reject bs > ps block devices when THP is disabled
  - From: Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] block: reject bs > ps block devices when THP is disabled
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v13 3/5] rust: replace `CStr` with `core::ffi::CStr`
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2] block: reject bs > ps block devices when THP is disabled
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] block: reject bs > ps block devices when THP is disabled
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux