On 6/27/25 1:28 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 09:43:29AM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/26/25 8:13 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> struct elevator_tags {
>> /* num. of hardware queues for which tags are allocated */
>> unsigned int nr_hw_queues;
>> /* depth used while allocating tags */
>> unsigned int nr_requests;
>> /* The index 0 in @tags is used to store shared sched tags */
>> struct blk_mq_tags **tags;
>
> s/struct blk_mq_tags **tags/struct blk_mq_tags *tags[];
>
> Then we can save one extra failure handling.
Yeah I think that's the advantage with the flex array!
>
>>
>> This seems like a clean and straightforward solution that should be easy to implement
>> without much hassle. Please let me know if this still needs adjustment.
>
> I think we are in same page now.
>
Great!
Thanks,
--Nilay
