On 6/26/25 17:39, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> While bdev_count_inflight is interating all cpus, if some IOs are issued
> from traversed cpu and then completed from the cpu that is not traversed
> yet:
>
> cpu0
> cpu1
> bdev_count_inflight
> //for_each_possible_cpu
> // cpu0 is 0
> infliht += 0
> // issue a io
> blk_account_io_start
> // cpu0 inflight ++
>
> cpu2
> // the io is done
> blk_account_io_done
> // cpu2 inflight --
> // cpu 1 is 0
> inflight += 0
> // cpu2 is -1
> inflight += -1
> ...
>
> In this case, the total inflight will be -1, causing lots of false
> warning. Fix the problem by removing the warning.
>
> Noted there is still a valid warning for nvme-mpath(From Yi) that is not
> fixed yet.
>
> Fixes: f5482ee5edb9 ("block: WARN if bdev inflight counter is negative")
> Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/aFtUXy-lct0WxY2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#mae89155a5006463d0a21a4a2c35ae0034b26a339
> Reported-and-tested-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/aFtUXy-lct0WxY2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m1d935a00070bf95055d0ac84e6075158b08acaef
> Reported-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/aFuypjqCXo9-5_En@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> block/genhd.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index 8171a6bc3210..680fa717082f 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -141,9 +141,14 @@ static void bdev_count_inflight_rw(struct block_device *part,
> }
> }
>
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE((int)inflight[READ] < 0))
> + /*
> + * While iterating all cpus, some IOs might issued from traversed cpu
> + * and then completed from the cpu that is not traversed yet, causing
> + * the inflight number to be negative.
Nit (grammar):
* While iterating all CPUs, some IOs may be issued from a CPU already
* traversed and complete on a CPU that has not yet been traversed,
* causing the inflight number to be negative.
> + */
> + if ((int)inflight[READ] < 0)
> inflight[READ] = 0;
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE((int)inflight[WRITE] < 0))
> + if ((int)inflight[WRITE] < 0)
> inflight[WRITE] = 0;
> }
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
