Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] block: use chunk_sectors when evaluating stacked atomic write limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/06/2025 03:40, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Furthermore, io_min may be mutated when stacking devices, and this
makes it a poor candidate to hold the stripe size. Such an example (of
when io_min may change) would be when the io_min is less than the
physical block size.
io_min is not allowed to be smaller than the physical_block_size. How
did we end up violating that requirement?

   logical_block_size <= physical_block_size <= io_min <= io_opt

I should have been a bit less ambiguous in my words.

I meant that if we try to set the stacked device io_min (from the stripe size) less than the bottom device phys block size, then this leads to the stacked device io_min being set to the bottom device phys block size. That's what I mean by mutating. And that's why it's a bad idea to assume that the stripe size is in io_min.

Having said that, we should probably reject this even being allowed – we should not have physical blocks straddling stripes.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux