On 6/11/25 10:16 PM, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
I'm afraid, no. I'm thinking about this kind of test cases:
- it uses "set -e"
- it does not use subshell
- it has clean up code in test() or test_device()
('IOW, it does not register cleanup handler by _register_test_cleanup())
For such test cases, the clean up code in test() or test_device() can be skipped
by error exit by "set -e" regardless of the "set +e" in _call_test().
Let's rely on source code review to catch test scripts that use set -e
without subshell.
Thanks,
Bart.
