On Tue Jun 10, 2025 at 3:44 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On 5/29/25 10:10 AM, Benno Lossin wrote: >> Remove the error from the blanket implementations `impl<T, E> Init<T, E> >> for T` (and also for `PinInit`). Add implementations for `Result<T, E>`. >> >> This allows one to easily construct (un)conditional failing >> initializers. It also improves the compatibility with APIs that do not >> use pin-init, because users can supply a `Result<T, E>` to a function >> taking an `impl PinInit<T, E>`. >> >> Suggested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/62/commits/58612514b256c6f4a4a0718be25298410e67387a >> [ Also fix a compile error in block. - Benno ] >> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> This patch is also needed by Danilo for initializing `Devres` >> ergonomically. > > For this purpose, can you please provide me with a signed tag for this one > please? Otherwise I can also add the explicit `Infallible` generics in a few > places until next cycle. I rebased `pin-init-next` to have these two commits as the first two and will create a tag a bit later in the cycle when I'm sure that they are stable. --- Cheers, Benno
