On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 09:30:36AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > It is the dm-default-key driver, a driver about which everyone > (including the authors of that driver) agree that it should disappear. > Unfortunately the functionality provided by that driver has not yet been > integrated in the upstream kernel (encrypt filesystem metadata). > > How that driver (dm-default-key) works is very similar to how dm-crypt > works. I think that the most important difference is that dm-crypt > requests encryption for all bios while dm-default-key only sets an > encryption key for a subset of the bios it processes. Umm, Bart I really expected better from you. You're ducking around providing a reproducer for over a week and waste multiple peoples time to tell us the only reproducer is your out of tree thingy reject upstream before? That's not really how Linux developement works.
