On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 06:37:33AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 07:26:45AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > > Darn, this part of the proposal is really the core concept of this patch > > set that everything builds around. It's what allows submitting > > arbitrarily large sized copy requests and letting the block layer > > efficiently split a bio to the queue limits later. > > Well, you can still do that without overloading the bio_bvec by just > making bi_io_vec in the bio itself a union. I like that idea. > - bio_add_copy_src not updating bi_size is unexpected and annoying :) Ha, I currently have the submitter responsible for bi_size. Your suggestion will make this easier to use.
