On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 06:31:33PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > I know that we can't have one without the other currently but there's > some cognitive PI dissonance wrt. keying off BIP_CHECK_GUARD only. > > Maybe worth considering: > > #define BIP_CHECK_FLAGS (BIP_CHECK_GUARD | BIP_CHECK_REFTAG | BIP_CHECK_APPTAG) > > and validating against that? Or a bip_should_check() wrapper. I'd vote for the helper.
