Re: [PATCH V4 0/7] blk-throttle: Split the blkthrotl queue to solve the IO delay issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/7] blk-throttle: Split the blkthrotl queue to solve the IO delay issue
From: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 09:16:18 +0800
Cc: yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx, yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx, ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <0f5ae9f4-05fd-48d1-924a-66ae159389bd@kernel.dk>
References: <20250423022301.3354136-1-wozizhi@huaweicloud.com> <7df3b05d-0e44-43b5-9d79-687e6297136c@huawei.com> <0f5ae9f4-05fd-48d1-924a-66ae159389bd@kernel.dk>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird



在 2025/5/6 9:09, Jens Axboe 写道:

On 5/5/25 7:04 PM, Zizhi Wo wrote:

friendly ping


It's not applying to the current 6.16 tree, please resend it.

OK, I will quickly resend a new version.

References:
- [PATCH V4 0/7] blk-throttle: Split the blkthrotl queue to solve the IO delay issue
  - From: Zizhi Wo
- Re: [PATCH V4 0/7] blk-throttle: Split the blkthrotl queue to solve the IO delay issue
  - From: Zizhi Wo
- Re: [PATCH V4 0/7] blk-throttle: Split the blkthrotl queue to solve the IO delay issue
  - From: Jens Axboe

Prev by Date: Re: Sequential read from NVMe/XFS twice slower on Fedora 42 than on Rocky 9.5
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] io_uring: support to register bvec buffer to specified io_uring
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH V4 0/7] blk-throttle: Split the blkthrotl queue to solve the IO delay issue
Next by thread: [PATCH v1] block: Fix bio complete cannot be traced
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux