On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 09:48:12PM +0800, Lizhi Xu wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:46:25 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > and maybe add a blurb that vfs_iter_read/write had this check. > > > It makes no sence. The current issue context does not involve vfs layer > > > iter_read/write related routines. > > > > Yes. But explaining how a change caused a regression is good > > information for a commit log. > What changes? > The check in vfs_iter_read/write is not relevant to this case. > It is best to not write something irrelevant. It is releavant in that vfs_iter_read/write have the check, and removal of their used caused szybot to be able to hit this issue.