Re: [PATCH V3] loop: Add sanity check for read/write_iter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 10:10:55AM +0800, Lizhi Xu wrote:
> +static int loop_check_backing_file(struct file *file, blk_mode_t mode, bool change)
> +{
> +	if (!file->f_op->read_iter)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (((file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) ||
> +	     (!change && (mode & BLK_OPEN_WRITE))) &&
> +	    (!file->f_op->write_iter))
> +		return -EINVAL;

This looks a bit odd.  Both callers have the open struct file, so
we should be able to check f_mode for both cases and not need the
change flag as far as I can tell.  Or did I miss something/

If for some reason we could not pass the fmode, the helper is
probably not all that useful.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux