Re: [PATCH V3 18/20] block: remove several ->elevator_lock
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH V3 18/20] block: remove several ->elevator_lock
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date
: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 20:38:45 +0200
Cc
: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Nilay Shroff <nilay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <
20250424152148.1066220-19-ming.lei@redhat.com
>
References
: <
20250424152148.1066220-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
> <
20250424152148.1066220-19-ming.lei@redhat.com
>
User-agent
: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
This is missing a "critial section: or similar in the Subject line for the grammar to make sense.
References
:
[PATCH V3 00/20] block: unify elevator changing and fix lockdep warning
From:
Ming Lei
[PATCH V3 18/20] block: remove several ->elevator_lock
From:
Ming Lei
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH V3 17/20] block: move debugfs/sysfs register out of freezing queue
Next by Date:
Re: [GIT PULL] Block fixes for 6.15-rc4
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH V3 18/20] block: remove several ->elevator_lock
Next by thread:
[PATCH V3 15/20] block: fail to show/store elevator sysfs attribute if elevator is dying
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[IDE]
[Linux Wireless]
[Linux Kernel]
[ATH6KL]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Device Mapper]