Re: [PATCH] block: integrity: Do not call set_page_dirty_lock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:14:27PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > I do not personally have a use case. But we support using file backed
> > memory right now and have since adding these user interfaces. Suddenly
> > removing the dirtying will cause silent data corruptions for these use
> > cases if they exist, which is not a good change.
> 
> Oopsing in the common use case isn't desirable either, though :(

Agreed.

> In any case I'll work some more on this tomorrow unless you beat me to
> it.

I'm not going to get to this today, I'm still in holiday catchup mode
with a huge unread inbox.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux