On 4/14/25 12:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:01:59AM +0800, Yunlong Xing wrote:
>> Set cmd->iocb.ki_ioprio to the ioprio of loop device's request.
>> The purpose is to inherit the original request ioprio in the aio
>> flow.
>
> This looks good, but has a mechanical conflict with my
> "loop: stop using vfs_iter_{read,write} for buffered I/O" patch
> that fixes setting the block size for direct I/O.
>
> Jens, any preference how we should order the patches? Should I resend
> on top of this smaller one or the other way around?
I think we layer yours on top of this one, which is something I
can just do without much trouble. Do we want the vfs_iter removal
in 6.15 or is 6.16 fine for that?
--
Jens Axboe
