Re: [PATCH 1/2] ublk: fix handling recovery & reissue in ublk_abort_queue()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 8:17 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 06:47:20PM -0700, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 12:25 AM Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Commit 8284066946e6 ("ublk: grab request reference when the request is handled
> > > by userspace") doesn't grab request reference in case of recovery reissue.
> > > Then the request can be requeued & re-dispatch & failed when canceling
> > > uring command.
> > >
> > > If it is one zc request, the request can be freed before io_uring
> > > returns the zc buffer back, then cause kernel panic:
> > >
> > > [  126.773061] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c8
> > > [  126.773657] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> > > [  126.774052] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> > > [  126.774455] PGD 0 P4D 0
> > > [  126.774698] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> > > [  126.775034] CPU: 13 UID: 0 PID: 1612 Comm: kworker/u64:55 Not tainted 6.14.0_blk+ #182 PREEMPT(full)
> > > [  126.775676] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014
> > > [  126.776275] Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work
> > > [  126.776651] RIP: 0010:ublk_io_release+0x14/0x130 [ublk_drv]
> > >
> > > Fixes it by always grabbing request reference for aborting the request.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/CADUfDZodKfOGUeWrnAxcZiLT+puaZX8jDHoj_sfHZCOZwhzz6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > Fixes: 8284066946e6 ("ublk: grab request reference when the request is handled by userspace")
> > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > > index 2fd05c1bd30b..41bed67508f2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > > @@ -1140,6 +1140,25 @@ static void ublk_complete_rq(struct kref *ref)
> > >         __ublk_complete_rq(req);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static void ublk_do_fail_rq(struct request *req)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct ublk_queue *ubq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data;
> > > +
> > > +       if (ublk_nosrv_should_reissue_outstanding(ubq->dev))
> > > +               blk_mq_requeue_request(req, false);
> > > +       else
> > > +               __ublk_complete_rq(req);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void ublk_fail_rq_fn(struct kref *ref)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct ublk_rq_data *data = container_of(ref, struct ublk_rq_data,
> > > +                       ref);
> > > +       struct request *req = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(data);
> > > +
> > > +       ublk_do_fail_rq(req);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /*
> > >   * Since ublk_rq_task_work_cb always fails requests immediately during
> > >   * exiting, __ublk_fail_req() is only called from abort context during
> > > @@ -1153,10 +1172,13 @@ static void __ublk_fail_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io,
> > >  {
> > >         WARN_ON_ONCE(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE);
> > >
> > > -       if (ublk_nosrv_should_reissue_outstanding(ubq->dev))
> > > -               blk_mq_requeue_request(req, false);
> > > -       else
> > > -               ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
> > > +       if (ublk_need_req_ref(ubq)) {
> > > +               struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> > > +
> > > +               kref_put(&data->ref, ublk_fail_rq_fn);
> >
> > I think this looks good, just a small question. If __ublk_fail_req()
> > is called but there is at least 1 other reference, ublk_do_fail_rq()
> > won't get called here. When the last reference is dropped, it will
> > call __ublk_complete_rq() instead. That checks for io->flags &
> > UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED and will terminate the I/O with BLK_STS_IOERR.
> > But is that the desired behavior in the
> > ublk_nosrv_should_reissue_outstanding() case? I would think it should
> > call blk_mq_requeue_request() instead.
>
> Good catch, I'd suggest to fix the kernel panic first, and this behavior
> for ublk_nosrv_should_reissue_outstanding() is less serious and can be
> fixed as one followup.
>
> Especially, Uday's approach "[PATCH v3] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit"[1]
> may simplify this area lot, with which requests aborting is moved to
> ublk_ch_release() after all uring_cmd are completed. Then we can get
> correct behavior for ublk_nosrv_should_reissue_outstanding() without any
> change basically.

Sounds like a good plan to me.

Thanks,
Caleb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux