On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 08:15:51AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 11:00:20PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 02:41:33PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > That's the sort of thing that process is supposed to avoid. To be clear, > > > you and Christoph are the two reasons I've had to harp on process in the > > > past - everyone else in the kernel has been fine. > > ... > > > In this case you very clearly misunderstood how the FUA bit works on > > reads (and clearly documented that misunderstanding in the commit log). > > FUA reads are clearly documented in the NVME spec. They are, and the semantics are as multiple people pointed out very different from what you claim they are in the commit message.
