On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 06:53:36PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 10:02:50PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 08:48:22PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 10:12:15AM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:24:41PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote: > > > > > The resource table data structure has traditionally been associated with > > > > > the remoteproc framework, where the resource table is included as a > > > > > section within the remote processor firmware binary. However, it is also > > > > > possible to obtain the resource table through other means—such as from a > > > > > reserved memory region populated by the boot firmware, statically > > > > > maintained driver data, or via a secure SMC call—when it is not embedded > > > > > in the firmware. > > > > > > > > > > There are multiple Qualcomm remote processors (e.g., Venus, Iris, GPU, > > > > > etc.) in the upstream kernel that do not use the remoteproc framework to > > > > > manage their lifecycle for various reasons. > > > > > > > > > > When Linux is running at EL2, similar to the Qualcomm PAS driver > > > > > (qcom_q6v5_pas.c), client drivers for subsystems like video and GPU may > > > > > also want to use the resource table SMC call to retrieve and map > > > > > resources before they are used by the remote processor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the examples you give here (Venus/Iris, GPU) have some sort of EL2 > > > > support already for older platforms: > > > > > > Example was taken from perspective of remote processor life-cycle management. > > > You are right they have worked before in non-secure way for Chrome. > > > > > > > > > > > - For GPU, we just skip loading the ZAP shader and access the protected > > > > registers directly. I would expect the ZAP shader does effectively > > > > the same, perhaps with some additional handling for secure mode. Is > > > > this even a real remote processor that has a separate IOMMU domain? > > > > > > > > > > I don't think it is the case and think the same that they can skip > > > loading and Hence, I have not yet added support for it. > > > > > > Will check internally before doing anything on GPU. > > > > > > > - For Venus/Iris, there is code upstream similar to your PATCH 11/11 > > > > that maps the firmware with the IOMMU (but invokes reset directly > > > > using the registers, without using PAS). There is no resource table > > > > used for that either, so at least all Venus/Iris versions so far > > > > apparently had no need for any mappings aside from the firmware > > > > binary. > > > > > > You are absolutely right > > > > > > > > > > > I understand that you want to continue using PAS for these, but I'm a > > > > bit confused what kind of mappings we would expect to have in the > > > > resource table for video and GPU. Could you give an example? > > > > > > We have some debug hw tracing available for video for lemans, which is > > > optional However, I believe infra is good to have incase we need some > > > required resources to be map for Video to work for a SoC. > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Stephan > > > > > > -- > > > -Mukesh Ojha > > > > Since I am not subscribed to any of the mailing lists to which this > > series was sent, I am not receiving emails from the list. As a result, > > your recent messages did not reach my inbox. Additionally, it seems your > > reply inadvertently removed me from the To-list. > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aKXqSU-487b6Je2B@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aKXQAoXZyR6SRPAA@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Indeed, but I don't think this is my fault: You have a strange > "Mail-Followup-To:" list in the email header of your reply [1] and my > email client honors it when I press "group reply". Your email client or > server seems to produce this header without including you in the follow > up list, as if you don't want to receive any replies. :-) > > I fixed it up manually this time, but perhaps you should look into the > source of this weird header in your replies, I'm probably not the only > person using mutt and just hitting "group reply" all the time ... Thanks for pointing out. I am trying to fix this, let me see with this reply. > > Stephan > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250820163250.hszey3i2gtd3o2i6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/raw -- -Mukesh Ojha
