On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 05:05:13PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 02:41:55PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 01:08:03PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > > A remoteproc could theoretically signal handover twice. This is unexpected > > > > theoretically or practically? > > > > You could easily trigger handover again from a custom remoteproc > firmware by setting the handover state to 0 and then back to 1. However, > if you find a firmware version doing this, you might want to have a > serious conversation with the firmware developer. It makes no sense to > do that. :-) > > In other words, on technical level it is practical. From a conceptual > point of view it is just theoretical. > > In any case, if it happens, we shouldn't mess up reference counters in > my opinion (or risk dereferencing invalid pointers etc). Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- With best wishes Dmitry
