On 23/08/2025 17:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/08/2025 17:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 22/08/2025 17:13, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 19/08/2025 18:54, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>>>>> +int iris_fw_init(struct iris_core *core)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct platform_device_info info;
>>>>> + struct iommu_domain *iommu_dom;
>>>>> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>>>>> + struct device_node *np;
>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + np = of_get_child_by_name(core->dev->of_node, "video-firmware");
>>>>
>>>> Undocumented ABI.
>>>>
>>>> If you tested your DTS, you would notice warnings.
>>>
>>> qcom,venus-common.yaml is documenting video-firmware and getting included in
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8550-iris.yaml
>>
>> Uh, why? Why does qcom keep this legacy pattern also for iris?
>
> I will remove it btw, because it is a fake device node (not for a real
> device).
So also to clarify: drop it here, because it will be undocumented.
Anyway such fake node was NAKed in other context.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
