Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/515] 6.15.11-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 at 16:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 02:06:04PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 13:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 01:30:46PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 12:02, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 00:18, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Boot regression: stable-rc 6.15.11-rc1 arm64 Qualcomm Dragonboard 410c
> > > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
> > > > > > qcom_scm_shm_bridge_enable
> > > > >
> > > > > I have reverted the following patch and the regression got fixed.
> > > > >
> > > > > firmware: qcom: scm: initialize tzmem before marking SCM as available
> > > > >     [ Upstream commit 87be3e7a2d0030cda6314d2ec96b37991f636ccd ]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi! I'm on vacation, I will look into this next week. I expect there
> > > > to be a fix on top of this commit.
> > >
> > > Ok, I'll go and drop this one from the queues now, thanks.
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > The issue was caused by only picking up commit 7ab36b51c6bee
> > ("firmware: qcom: scm: request the waitqueue irq *after* initializing
> > SCM") into stable, while the following four must be applied instead:
> >
> > 23972da96e1ee ("firmware: qcom: scm: remove unused arguments from SHM
> > bridge routines")
> > dc3f4e75c54c1 ("firmware: qcom: scm: take struct device as argument in
> > SHM bridge enable")
> > 87be3e7a2d003 ("firmware: qcom: scm: initialize tzmem before marking
> > SCM as available")
> > 7ab36b51c6bee ("firmware: qcom: scm: request the waitqueue irq *after*
> > initializing SCM")
>
> 6.15.y is long end-of-life, so is anything still to be done here?
>

The same applies to all other branches for which Naresh reported an
issue: 6.12, 6.15 and 6.16. I think only 6.16 is still relevant.

Bartosz




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux