On 28/08/2025 15:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> break, just that there are no in-tree DTS user means no ABI break ? >> Would appreciate if you could point to any guidelines if my understanding is not >> correct, i am currently referring to [1] > > There are hundreds of discussions describing this and I am not going to > do your homework. > > In none of other qcom media camss/iris/venus patches affecting ABI you And the proof that you talk about ABI only when it is convenient for you - where are any comments from you in these threads affecting ABI: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250121120901.1841142-2-quic_vikramsa@xxxxxxxxxxx/ v1-v6: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241209-media-staging-24-11-25-rb3-hw-compat-string-v5-3-ef7e5f85f302@xxxxxxxxxx/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211206151811.39271-3-robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250426-b4-media-committers-25-04-25-camss-supplies-v3-1-19e5e72ffc3e@xxxxxxxxxx/ > raised that problem. Even remotely, so I cannot understand these > questions here differently than just spreading some sort of FUD over > this patch just to keep that broken video-firmware design for future users. Best regards, Krzysztof
