Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/msm/a6xx: Fix GMU firmware parser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/2/25 1:50 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> Current parser logic for GMU firmware assumes a dword aligned payload
> size for every block. This is not true for all GMU firmwares. So, fix
> this by using correct 'size' value in the calculation for the offset
> for the next block's header.

Hm, I haven't seen this in the wild - do you have any specific examples?

> 
> Fixes: c6ed04f856a4 ("drm/msm/a6xx: A640/A650 GMU firmware path")
> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> index 28e6705c6da682c7b41c748e375dda59a6551898..ea52374c9fcd481d816ed9608e9f6eb1c2e3005a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> @@ -758,6 +758,8 @@ static bool fw_block_mem(struct a6xx_gmu_bo *bo, const struct block_header *blk)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +#define NEXT_BLK(blk) ((const struct block_header *)((const char *)blk + sizeof(*blk) + blk->size))

CHECK: Macro argument 'blk' may be better as '(blk)' to avoid precedence issues
#146: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c:761:
+#define NEXT_BLK(blk) ((const struct block_header *)((const char *)blk + sizeof(*blk) + blk->size))

Konrad




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux