Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] dt-bindings: display/msm: dp-controller: Add sm6150

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 05:34:43PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
> Add DisplayPort controller for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC.
> While SM6150 currently shares the same configuration as SC7180,
> its hardware capabilities differ. Explicitly listing it ensures clarity
> and avoids potential issues if SC7180 support evolves in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
> index 9923b065323bbab99de5079b674a0317f3074373..996d0132e084d401db85014a1a4e445d00d62ed8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ properties:
>            - qcom,sc8280xp-dp
>            - qcom,sc8280xp-edp
>            - qcom,sdm845-dp
> +          - qcom,sm6150-dp

The DP MST bindings were A-b'ed and R-b'ed by Rob, so I picked them up
into msm-next-lumag. Please rebase your patchset on top of it and
resend. At this point I'm interested in DP bindings and DP driver
patches, the PHY part can come up separately.

As for the compatibilities, I think DP on SM6150 should be compatible
with either DP on SDM845 or DP on SM8350. Please choose one which suits
better.

>            - qcom,sm8350-dp
>            - qcom,sm8650-dp
>        - items:
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux