On 9/4/25 7:11 PM, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 07:34:00PM +0000, Hrishabh Rajput via B4 Relay wrote:
>> +static int gunyah_wdt_call(unsigned long func_id, unsigned long arg1,
>> + unsigned long arg2, struct arm_smccc_res *res)
>> +{
>> + arm_smccc_1_1_smc(func_id, arg1, arg2, res);
>> + return gunyah_error_remap(res->a0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int gunyah_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>> +{
>> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
>> + unsigned int timeout_ms;
>> + unsigned int pretimeout_ms;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = gunyah_wdt_call(GUNYAH_WDT_CONTROL, WDT_CTRL_DISABLE, 0, &res);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> When I ran a simple echo test, it failed here on SM8650 with -EINVAL. May be Gunyah
> does not allow disabling watchdog when it is not enabled in the first
> place. May be something you can check if this is a difference between
> 8750 vs 8650.
Hm, makes one wonder if the opposite (won't enable when already enabled)
is true..
Konrad
