Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: leds: add generic LED consumer documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/5/25 9:59 AM, Aleksandrs Vinarskis wrote:
> Introduce common generic led consumer binding, where consumer defines
> led(s) by phandle, as opposed to trigger-source binding where the
> trigger source is defined in led itself.
> 
> Add already used in some schemas 'leds' parameter which expects
> phandle-array. Additionally, introduce 'led-names' which could be used
> by consumers to map LED devices to their respective functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

[...]

> +    i2c {
> +      #address-cells = <1>;
> +      #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +      camera@36 {
> +        compatible = "ovti,ov02c10";
> +        reg = <0x36>;
> +
> +        reset-gpios = <&tlmm 237 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +        pinctrl-names = "default";
> +        pinctrl-0 = <&cam_rgb_default>;
> +
> +        led-names = "privacy-led";
> +        leds = <&privacy_led>;

property
property-names

is a common pattern

I know this is just an example, but people will copypaste it

Konrad




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux