On 14/08/2025 02:59, Harrison Vanderbyl wrote:
> Describe describe driver quirks for x1e80100 ufs device
> Signed-off-by: Harrison Vanderbyl <harrison.vanderbyl@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 3 +++
> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> index 9c69c77d10c8..b88cafac4da7 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> @@ -2168,6 +2168,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id qmp_ufs_of_match_table[] = {
> }, {
> .compatible = "qcom,sm8750-qmp-ufs-phy",
> .data = &sm8750_ufsphy_cfg,
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-qmp-ufs-phy",
> + .data = &sm8550_ufsphy_cfg,
So it is fully compatible? If so then don't duplicate entries and
express compatibility with fallback.
> },
>
> { },
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 76fc70503a62..2e143ccd1a03 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -2282,6 +2282,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ufs_qcom_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,ufshc" },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-ufshc", .data = &ufs_qcom_sm8550_drvdata },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8650-ufshc", .data = &ufs_qcom_sm8550_drvdata },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-ufshc", .data = &ufs_qcom_sm8550_drvdata },
Same problem here.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
