On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 10:21:41AM +0300, Askar Safin wrote:
+ KAPI_PARAM_IN = (1 << 0), + KAPI_PARAM_OUT = (1 << 1), + KAPI_PARAM_INOUT = (1 << 2),There is no need for KAPI_PARAM_INOUT. It could be replaced by KAPI_PARAM_IN | KAPI_PARAM_OUT
It could, but it's easier to write _INOUT :) -- Thanks, Sasha
