Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] AppArmor: add support for lsm_config_self_policy and lsm_config_system_policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] AppArmor: add support for lsm_config_self_policy and lsm_config_system_policy
From: Maxime Bélair <maxime.belair@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 11:10:36 +0200
Cc: john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxx, serge@xxxxxxxxxx, mic@xxxxxxxxxxx, kees@xxxxxxxxxx, stephen.smalley.work@xxxxxxxxx, casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, takedakn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, song@xxxxxxxxxx, rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, apparmor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5313b937-304a-4f2a-8563-3ad1ea194cb9@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
References: <20250624143211.436045-1-maxime.belair@canonical.com> <20250624143211.436045-4-maxime.belair@canonical.com> <5313b937-304a-4f2a-8563-3ad1ea194cb9@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird


On 6/25/25 03:21, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Huge memory leak.
> Here too. :-)
Nice catch, this is fixed in the next iteration.

References:
- [PATCH v3 0/3] lsm: introduce lsm_config_self_policy() and lsm_config_system_policy() syscalls
  - From: Maxime Bélair
- [PATCH v3 3/3] AppArmor: add support for lsm_config_self_policy and lsm_config_system_policy
  - From: Maxime Bélair
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] AppArmor: add support for lsm_config_self_policy and lsm_config_system_policy
  - From: Tetsuo Handa

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 00/19] Kernel API Specification Framework
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] lsm: introduce security_lsm_config_*_policy hooks
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] AppArmor: add support for lsm_config_self_policy and lsm_config_system_policy
Next by thread: [RFC v2 00/22] Kernel API specification framework
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux