Re: [PATCH v2 04/18] cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: Use __free(put_cpufreq_policy) for policy reference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2025/8/29 14:26, Viresh Kumar 写道:
On 29-08-25, 14:16, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
Thanks for applying the patch!

I’ve been thinking further — instead of using __free directly, maybe we
could introduce a small macro wrapper around it to make the release scope
more controllable and consistent.

Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/6174bcc8-30f5-479b-bac6-f42eb1232b4d@xxxxxxxxxx/

Do you think this would be a better approach, or should we just stick with
the current use of __free?
Lets keep it simple for now and use __free directly. And keep this
similar with other parts of the kernel.


Got it. Thanks!






[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux