On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 23:17:38 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 20.08.25 21:47, Dave Jiang wrote: > > Add clarification to comment for memory hotplug callback ordering as the > > current comment does not provide clear language on which callback happens > > first. > > > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v2: > > - Clearer comment suggestion from DavidH. > > --- > > include/linux/memory.h | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/memory.h b/include/linux/memory.h > > index 40eb70ccb09d..de5c0d8e8925 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/memory.h > > +++ b/include/linux/memory.h > > @@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ struct notifier_block; > > struct mem_section; > > > > /* > > - * Priorities for the hotplug memory callback routines (stored in decreasing > > - * order in the callback chain) > > + * Priorities for the hotplug memory callback routines. Invoked from > > + * high to low. Higher priorities corresponds to higher numbers. > > Minor nit: s/corresponds/correspond/ With that tidied up Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> >
