On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 1:27 PM Kaushlendra Kumar
<kaushlendra.kumar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The function ap_is_valid_checksum() has a boolean name suggesting it
> should return TRUE/FALSE, but incorrectly returns AE_OK on success and
> has no explicit return on failure, leading to undefined behavior.
>
> Fix by returning proper values:
> - FALSE when checksum validation fails
> - TRUE when checksum validation succeeds
>
> Signed-off-by: Kaushlendra Kumar <kaushlendra.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
Please submit ACPICA changes to the upstream ACPICA project on GitHub.
They are not going to be applied directly to the Linux kernel code
unless they are based on existing upstream ACPICA commits.
> ---
> tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidump/apdump.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidump/apdump.c b/tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidump/apdump.c
> index bf30143efbdc..7a6223aa703c 100644
> --- a/tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidump/apdump.c
> +++ b/tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidump/apdump.c
> @@ -86,9 +86,10 @@ u8 ap_is_valid_checksum(struct acpi_table_header *table)
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> fprintf(stderr, "%4.4s: Warning: wrong checksum in table\n",
> table->signature);
> + return (FALSE);
> }
>
> - return (AE_OK);
> + return (TRUE);
> }
>
> /******************************************************************************
> --
> 2.34.1
>
