(Cc: Javier) On Wed Sep 3, 2025 at 3:18 PM CEST, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Do we really need the available variant? > > Please see > <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Zwj12J5bTNUEnxA0@kekkonen.localdomain/>. > > I'll post a patch to remove fwnode_get_next_available_child_node(), too. Either I'm missing something substantial or the link does indeed not provide an obvious justification of why you want to send a patch to remove fwnode_get_next_available_child_node(). Do you mean to say that all fwnode backends always return true for device_is_available() and hence the fwnode API should not make this distinction? I.e. are you referring to the fact that of_fwnode_get_next_child_node() always calls of_get_next_available_child() and swnode has no device_is_available() callback and hence is always available? What about ACPI?
