On Thu Sep 4, 2025 at 11:59 AM CEST, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 11:49:25AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> >> > It might be good to have an immutable branch for me from i2c core. >> > Wolfram, can you provide a such if no objections? >> >> Sure thing, I can do that. But there is still discussion on patch 1, so >> I will wait for an outcome there. > > But it seems that the discussion can be implemented in a followup? If Sakari attempts the rework, and we can prove this doesn't regress existing users, removing fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped() in the context of the rework again should be trivial. Given that, I don't see a reason to stall people working with the existing semantics of the API in the meantime. So, AFAIC, my ACK is still valid.
