Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor: Fix function defined but not used warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2025/9/4 23:23, Rafael J. Wysocki 写道:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 2:11 PM Huisong Li <lihuisong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=n and CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE=n, we may
encounter some compling warnings as the following link said.
So remove these empty function definition because they are just used
in processor_driver.c and if CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is selected and
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE also be selected automatically.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202508300519.tZQHY6HA-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/acpi/processor.h | 34 +++-------------------------------
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
index 360b673f05e5..a4e1081fd0da 100644
--- a/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
@@ -417,40 +417,17 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_throttling_init(void) {}
  #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS */

  /* in processor_idle.c */
-extern struct cpuidle_driver acpi_idle_driver;
  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE
+extern struct cpuidle_driver acpi_idle_driver;
Are the changes above related to the warning?  If not, maybe move them
to a separate patch?
Ok, will do it in a separate patch.

  int acpi_processor_power_init(struct acpi_processor *pr);
  int acpi_processor_power_exit(struct acpi_processor *pr);
  int acpi_processor_power_state_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr);
  int acpi_processor_hotplug(struct acpi_processor *pr);
  void acpi_processor_register_idle_driver(void);
  void acpi_processor_unregister_idle_driver(void);
-#else
-static inline int acpi_processor_power_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
-       return -ENODEV;
-}
-
-static inline int acpi_processor_power_exit(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
-       return -ENODEV;
-}
-
-static inline int acpi_processor_power_state_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
-       return -ENODEV;
-}

-static inline int acpi_processor_hotplug(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
-       return -ENODEV;
-}
-static inline void acpi_processor_register_idle_driver(void)
-{
-}
-static inline void acpi_processor_unregister_idle_driver(void)
-{
-}
+extern int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu);
+extern int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi);
Please remove the "extern" from these declarations.
Ack

  #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE */

  /* in processor_thermal.c */
@@ -473,11 +450,6 @@ static inline void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
  }
  #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */

-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE
-extern int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu);
-extern int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi);
-#endif
-
  void acpi_processor_init_invariance_cppc(void);

  #endif
--




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux