Re: [PATCH 17/33] arm_mpam: Probe the hardware features resctrl supports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ben,

On 28/08/2025 14:44, Ben Horgan wrote:
> On 8/22/25 16:29, James Morse wrote:
>> Expand the probing support with the control and monitor types
>> we can use with resctrl.

>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> index 012e09e80300..290a04f8654f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static LLIST_HEAD(mpam_garbage);
>>  
>>  static u32 __mpam_read_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg)
>>  {
>> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(reg > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
>> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(reg + sizeof(u32) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);

> Update in the patch that introduced this line.

Yeah - this got ripped out.
Now that the size is in the ACPI table, I should never need to debug it being wrong!
(and the resulting translation fault will be enough to say something is wrong)


>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> index c6f087f9fa7d..9f6cd4a68cce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> @@ -136,6 +136,56 @@ static inline void mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(struct mpam_msc *msc)

>> +/* Bits for mpam_features_t */
>> +enum mpam_device_features {
>> +	mpam_feat_ccap_part = 0,
>> +	mpam_feat_cpor_part,
>> +	mpam_feat_mbw_part,
>> +	mpam_feat_mbw_min,
>> +	mpam_feat_mbw_max,
>> +	mpam_feat_mbw_prop,
>> +	mpam_feat_msmon,
>> +	mpam_feat_msmon_csu,
>> +	mpam_feat_msmon_csu_capture,
>> +	mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy,
>> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu,
>> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_capture,
>> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw,
>> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy,
>> +	mpam_feat_msmon_capt,
>> +	MPAM_FEATURE_LAST,

> This isn't all the features or just the features supported by resctrl.
> Just add them all in this patch?

I'm having trouble parsing this ...

I needed somewhere to split the features up, as there are rather a lot. Those that resctrl
supports seemed like the logical spot.


>> +};
>> +static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(mpam_features_t) >= MPAM_FEATURE_LAST);
>> +#define MPAM_ALL_FEATURES      ((1 << MPAM_FEATURE_LAST) - 1)

> Unused?

Fixed, thanks!


Thanks,

James




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux