[PATCH v1 16/16] ACPICA: acpidump: fix return values in ap_is_valid_checksum()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Kaushlendra Kumar <kaushlendra.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>

The function ap_is_valid_checksum() has a boolean name suggesting it
should return TRUE/FALSE, but incorrectly returns AE_OK on success and
has no explicit return on failure, leading to undefined behavior.

Fix by returning proper values:
 - FALSE when checksum validation fails
 - TRUE when checksum validation succeeds

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/479ba862
Signed-off-by: Kaushlendra Kumar <kaushlendra.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidump/apdump.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidump/apdump.c b/tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidump/apdump.c
index bf30143efbdc..7a6223aa703c 100644
--- a/tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidump/apdump.c
+++ b/tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidump/apdump.c
@@ -86,9 +86,10 @@ u8 ap_is_valid_checksum(struct acpi_table_header *table)
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "%4.4s: Warning: wrong checksum in table\n",
 			table->signature);
+		return (FALSE);
 	}
 
-	return (AE_OK);
+	return (TRUE);
 }
 
 /******************************************************************************
-- 
2.51.0








[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux