hello Shuai,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 11:03:51AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> 在 2025/7/16 20:42, Breno Leitao 写道:
> > That said, Tony proposed a more robust approach—categorizing and
> > tracking errors by their source. This would involve maintaining separate
> > counters for each source using an counter per enum type:
> >
> > enum recovered_error_sources {
> > ERR_GHES,
> > ERR_MCE,
> > ERR_AER,
> > ...
> > ERR_NUM_SOURCES
> > };
> >
> > See more at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aHWC-J851eaHa_Au@agluck-desk3/
> >
> > Do you think this would help you by any chance?
>
> Personally, I think this approach would be more helpful. Additionally, I
> suggest not mixing CEs (Correctable Errors) and UEs (Uncorrectable
> Errors) together. This is especially important for memory errors, as CEs
> occur much more frequently than UEs, but their impact is much smaller.
Yes, I totally agree. This would be even better than my original
solution. Let me spend some time on it and see how further I can go.
Thanks for your opinions,
--breno
