On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 7:17 AM Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet4linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Update invalid value returned debug print with fps_count > instead of control value for checking fan fps count condition. > > Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet4linux@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/fan_core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/fan_core.c b/drivers/acpi/fan_core.c > index 8ad12ad3aaaf..9f2696a1928c 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/fan_core.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/fan_core.c > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int fan_get_state_acpi4(struct acpi_device *device, unsigned long *state) > break; > } > if (i == fan->fps_count) { > - dev_dbg(&device->dev, "Invalid control value returned\n"); > + dev_dbg(&device->dev, "Invalid fps_count value returned\n"); I guess this should be "fps" instead of "fps_count" because the latter is just the array size, isn't it? But I don't see why it should not be "control" either. > return -EINVAL; > } > > --