Hi Ricardo,
Thank you for the patch.
I would use "software entities" and not "virtual entities" in the
subject line and everywhere else, as those entities are not virtual.
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 05:53:05PM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> Neither the GPIO nor the SWENTITY entities form part of the device
> pipeline. We just create them to hold emulated uvc controls.
>
> When the device initializes, a warning is thrown by the v4l2 core:
> uvcvideo 1-1:1.0: Entity type for entity SWENTITY was not initialized!
>
> There are no entity function that matches what we are doing here, and
> it does not make to much sense to create a function for entities that
> do not really exist.
I don't agree with this. The purpose of reporting entities to userspace
through the MC API is to let application enumerate what entities a
device contains. Being able to enumerate software entities seems as
useful as being able to enumerate hardware entities.
> Do not create MC entities for them and pretend nothing happened here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c
> index d1a652ef35ec34801bd39a5124b834edf838a79e..2dbeb4ab0c4c8cc763ff2dcd2d836a50f3c6a040 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,16 @@ static int uvc_mc_init_entity(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> {
> int ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Do not initialize virtual entities, they do not really exist
> + * and are not connected to any other entities.
> + */
> + switch (UVC_ENTITY_TYPE(entity)) {
> + case UVC_EXT_GPIO_UNIT:
> + case UVC_SWENTITY_UNIT:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> if (UVC_ENTITY_TYPE(entity) != UVC_TT_STREAMING) {
> u32 function;
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
